Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
TUTT DIVERSION DAM
Structure dossier · WDID 1201118 · 1 · GOULD CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1861-04-15 — 10th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ROSEMONT RES PIPELINE (1861-04-15). Immediately behind: IDEAL CEMENT PUMP PLANT (1861-05-01).
Decreed rights (23)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4123.0 | 1861-04-15 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 4 |
| 4158.0 | 1861-05-20 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 7 |
| 5254.0 | 1864-05-20 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 19 |
| 5569.0 | 1865-03-31 | 1894-02-03 | 0.7 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 23 |
| 5623.0 | 1865-05-24 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 27 |
| 7792.0 | 1871-05-02 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 70 |
| 7944.0 | 1871-10-01 | 1894-02-03 | 0.7 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 76 |
| 8024.0 | 1871-12-20 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 19 |
| 8037.0 | 1872-01-02 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 20 |
| 8403.0 | 1873-01-02 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 107 |
| 8432.0 | 1873-01-31 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 109 |
| 8552.0 | 1873-05-31 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 122 |
| 8825.0 | 1874-02-28 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 132 |
| 9236.0 | 1875-04-15 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 151 |
| 9499.0 | 1876-01-03 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 162 |
| 9632.0 | 1876-05-15 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 171 |
| 9648.0 | 1876-05-31 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 172 |
| 9970.0 | 1877-04-18 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 184 |
| 10348.0 | 1878-05-01 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 198 |
| 11382.0 | 1881-02-28 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 245 |
| 11396.0 | 1881-03-14 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 246 |
| 11707.0 | 1882-01-19 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 262 |
| 18411.17511 | 1897-12-10 | 1901-11-12 | 6.5 | 0.0 | C | ALL | 417 |
Legal record & documents
35 decreed actions on record across
4 court cases:
CA7396, W4528, CA6693, 11CW0083.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA7396 | 1 | 1901-11-12 | S |
W4528 | 24 | 1894-02-03 | O |
CA6693 | 6 | 1894-02-03 | O |
11CW0083 | 4 | 1894-02-03 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 23 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | absent | no diversion records cached |
| record continuity | unknown | no record span to measure against |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.