Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
IDEAL CEMENT PUMP PLANT
Structure dossier · WDID 1200631 · 1 · ARKANSAS RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1861-05-01 — 11th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TUTT DIVERSION DAM (1861-04-15). Immediately behind: HOLCIM QUARRY POND (1861-05-01).
Decreed rights (11)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4139.0 | 1861-05-01 | 1894-02-03 | 1.052 | 0.0 | C | MUNINDDOM | 6 |
| 7456.0 | 1870-05-31 | 1894-02-03 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | MUNINDDOM | 54 |
| 10227.0 | 1877-12-31 | 1906-07-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUNCOMRECFISFIRDOMAUGWLD | 194 |
| 11383.0 | 1881-03-01 | 1903-11-14 | 1.5 | 0.0 | C | IND | 245.5 |
| 11839.0 | 1882-05-31 | 1894-02-03 | 0.6 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRCOMINDAUG | 273 |
| 12204.0 | 1883-05-31 | 1894-02-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUNCOMRECFISFIRDOMAUGWLD | 291 |
| 12234.0 | 1883-06-30 | 1894-02-03 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IND | 293 |
| 12524.0 | 1884-04-15 | 1903-11-14 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IND | 304 |
| 19066.0 | 1902-03-15 | 1916-02-14 | 11.5 | 0.0 | C | IND | NI38, NI39 |
| 19470.0 | 1903-04-23 | 1916-02-14 | 3.5 | 0.0 | C | IND | NI40 |
| 56978.56806 | 2005-07-12 | 2006-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUNCOMRECFISFIRDOMAUGWLD |
Legal record & documents
14 decreed actions on record across
7 court cases:
24CW3034, 06CW0012, CA6510, CA2637, CA7521, CA7522, 16CW3102.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
24CW3034 | 1 | 2006-12-31 | S |
06CW0012 | 3 | 2006-12-31 | O, S |
CA6510 | 5 | 1916-02-14 | O |
CA2637 | 1 | 1916-02-14 | O |
CA7521 | 1 | 1903-11-14 | O |
CA7522 | 2 | 1894-02-03 | O |
16CW3102 | 1 | 1894-02-03 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 354 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 192 AF — 54% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 388 | 11th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 365 | 1.7 |
| 2004 | 1,128 | 14th lowest of 15 · 319% of median | 366 | 374.2 |
| 2005 | 422 | 12th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 365 | 11.0 |
| 2006 | 354 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 365 | 1.4 |
| 2007 | 331 | 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 365 | 2.4 |
| 2008 | 326 | 6th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 366 | 1.3 |
| 2009 | 262 | 4th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 365 | 1.4 |
| 2010 | 246 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 297 | 1.4 |
| 2019 | 48 | 1st lowest of 15 · 14% of median | 61 | 1.1 |
| 2020 | 436 | 13th lowest of 15 · 123% of median | 366 | 1.6 |
| 2021 | 316 | 5th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 365 | 1.1 |
| 2022 | 374 | 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 365 | 1.5 |
| 2023 | 377 | 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 365 | 1.8 |
| 2024 | 98,830 | 15th lowest of 15 · 27918% of median | 366 | 1068.8 |
| 2025 | 192 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 54% of median | 304 | 1.3 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 11 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 25624 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1911-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.