← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ERNEST ROLL DITCH NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 1300639 · 1 · GRAPE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:43 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1879-05-01274th most senior of the 1017 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HOWARD DITCH NO 3 (1879-04-30). Immediately behind: CORRAL DITCH (1879-05-01).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
10713.01879-05-011896-03-12 0.40.0 CIRR 213A
14792.01890-07-011896-03-12 0.60.0 CIRR 496B

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 10 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 11 AF — 116% of that, and 6th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1969 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 61 0.0
1970 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 261 0.0
1975 62 9th lowest of 10 · 653% of median 73 0.5
1979 21 7th lowest of 10 · 221% of median 28 0.4
1980 31 8th lowest of 10 · 326% of median 40 0.4
1995 116 10th lowest of 10 · 1221% of median 117 0.5
1996 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2021 8 5th lowest of 10 · 84% of median 10 0.6
2022 1 4th lowest of 10 · 10% of median 5 0.2
2023 11 6th lowest of 10 · 116% of median 21 0.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 617 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 5% of the irrigation seasons in 1969-2023 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.