← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

KITZMAN & TOD DITCH NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 1300871 · 1 · MIDDLE TAYLOR CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:32 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1879-07-10296th most senior of the 1017 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CHARLES IRELAND DITCH (1879-07-07). Immediately behind: IRELAND DITCH NO 2 (1879-09-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
10783.01879-07-101896-03-12 1.50.0 CIRR 232

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 45 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 22 AF — 49% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1976 123 14th lowest of 15 · 273% of median 78 0.9
1979 157 15th lowest of 15 · 349% of median 56 1.5
1980 27 4th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 10 1.5
1994 39 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 16 1.5
1995 45 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 114 0.2
1996 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1997 89 12th lowest of 15 · 198% of median 32 1.5
1998 83 11th lowest of 15 · 184% of median 30 1.5
1999 65 10th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 24 1.5
2003 107 13th lowest of 15 · 238% of median 37 1.5
2004 32 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median 54 0.3
2009 9 2nd lowest of 15 · 20% of median 14 0.5
2016 45 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 24 1.2
2017 54 9th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 39 0.8
2019 22 3rd lowest of 15 · 49% of median 11 1.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.