← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SCHULZ DITCH NO 2 REID

Structure dossier · WDID 1301191 · 1 · HUDSON CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1882-06-01380th most senior of the 1017 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HUDSON SIEBER FROZE CR 2 (1882-06-01). Immediately behind: ULRICH KUSTER DITCH NO 1 (1882-06-05).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
11840.01882-06-011896-03-12 2.250.0 CIRR 333

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 138 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 119 AF — 86% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2004 138 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 37 2.2
2005 504 15th lowest of 15 · 365% of median 116 2.2
2007 128 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 62 2.2
2008 119 4th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 31 2.2
2009 30 1st lowest of 15 · 22% of median 23 0.8
2010 46 2nd lowest of 15 · 33% of median 31 0.9
2014 209 12th lowest of 15 · 151% of median 53 2.3
2015 120 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 29 2.2
2016 53 3rd lowest of 15 · 38% of median 14 2.2
2017 183 11th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 43 2.2
2019 279 14th lowest of 15 · 202% of median 91 2.2
2021 228 13th lowest of 15 · 165% of median 80 2.2
2022 153 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 43 2.2
2023 178 10th lowest of 15 · 129% of median 42 2.2
2024 119 4th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 29 2.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.