← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SCHULZ DITCH NO 2 REID
Structure dossier · WDID 1301191 · 1 · HUDSON CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1882-06-01 — 380th most senior of the 1017 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HUDSON SIEBER FROZE CR 2 (1882-06-01). Immediately behind: ULRICH KUSTER DITCH NO 1 (1882-06-05).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11840.0 | 1882-06-01 | 1896-03-12 | 2.25 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 333 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 138 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 119 AF — 86% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 138 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 37 | 2.2 |
| 2005 | 504 | 15th lowest of 15 · 365% of median | 116 | 2.2 |
| 2007 | 128 | 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 62 | 2.2 |
| 2008 | 119 | 4th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 31 | 2.2 |
| 2009 | 30 | 1st lowest of 15 · 22% of median | 23 | 0.8 |
| 2010 | 46 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 33% of median | 31 | 0.9 |
| 2014 | 209 | 12th lowest of 15 · 151% of median | 53 | 2.3 |
| 2015 | 120 | 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 29 | 2.2 |
| 2016 | 53 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 38% of median | 14 | 2.2 |
| 2017 | 183 | 11th lowest of 15 · 133% of median | 43 | 2.2 |
| 2019 | 279 | 14th lowest of 15 · 202% of median | 91 | 2.2 |
| 2021 | 228 | 13th lowest of 15 · 165% of median | 80 | 2.2 |
| 2022 | 153 | 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 43 | 2.2 |
| 2023 | 178 | 10th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | 42 | 2.2 |
| 2024 | 119 | 4th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 29 | 2.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.