Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
1400534
Structure dossier · WDID 1400534 · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 02:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1870-11-30 — 12th most senior of the 1358 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COMANCHE PUMP STATION (1870-03-21). Immediately behind: PUEBLO RESERVOIR (1870-11-30).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7639.0 | 1870-11-30 | 1896-03-23 | 1.03 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRCOMAUG | 27, 333/45 |
| 10592.0 | 1878-12-31 | 1896-03-23 | 0.29 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRCOMAUG | 36 |
| 14245.0 | 1888-12-31 | 1896-03-23 | 1.6 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRCOMAUG | 59 |
Legal record & documents
17 decreed actions on record across
4 court cases:
CA8135, CA2535, 12CW0102, 03CW0008.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA8135 | 2 | 1896-03-23 | O |
CA2535 | 3 | 1896-03-23 | O |
12CW0102 | 6 | 1896-03-23 | O |
03CW0008 | 6 | 1896-03-23 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 154 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 158 AF — 103% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 22 | 1st lowest of 15 · 14% of median | 22 | 61 | 0.2 |
| 2012 | 136 | 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 136 | 306 | 0.3 |
| 2013 | 576 | 15th lowest of 15 · 374% of median | 576 | 214 | 2.4 |
| 2014 | 105 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 105 | 275 | 0.3 |
| 2015 | 136 | 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 136 | 304 | 0.4 |
| 2016 | 99 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 99 | 214 | 0.4 |
| 2017 | 128 | 4th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 128 | 275 | 0.9 |
| 2018 | 153 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 153 | 365 | 0.6 |
| 2019 | 162 | 12th lowest of 15 · 105% of median | 162 | 304 | 0.9 |
| 2020 | 157 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 157 | 275 | 0.9 |
| 2021 | 166 | 13th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 166 | 365 | 0.9 |
| 2022 | 154 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 154 | 365 | 0.8 |
| 2023 | 170 | 14th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 170 | 365 | 1.1 |
| 2024 | 158 | 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 158 | 366 | 1.1 |
| 2025 | 158 | 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 158 | 304 | 0.9 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is rising over its last 15 recorded years (+4 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.022).
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | partial | missing name, structure type, water source |
| decreed rights | on file | 3 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 8637 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 36% of the irrigation seasons in 1913-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.