← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

RIVERSIDE DAIRY DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 1400536 · 1 · ARKANSAS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:50 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1883-01-0121st most senior of the 1358 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LAKE HENRY (1881-03-10). Immediately behind: COLLIER DITCH (1887-03-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12054.01883-01-011896-03-23 1.00.0 CIRR 0

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 572 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 500 AF — 87% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 671 14th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 313 1.9
2012 374 1st lowest of 15 · 65% of median 217 1.4
2013 565 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 260 2.0
2014 606 11th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 245 2.1
2015 501 3rd lowest of 15 · 88% of median 213 2.5
2016 589 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 275 2.6
2017 557 5th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 306 2.2
2018 655 13th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 365 2.1
2019 572 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 334 2.1
2020 562 6th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 306 1.9
2021 545 4th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 365 1.6
2022 701 15th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 365 2.4
2023 630 12th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 365 2.1
2024 578 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 366 2.9
2025 500 2nd lowest of 15 · 87% of median 304 2.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 12955 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1965-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.