← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

TELLER CANAL

Structure dossier · WDID 1400604 · 1 · TURKEY CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:57 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1909-08-1369th most senior of the 1358 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SANDOVAL WELL NO 1 (1909-07-31). Immediately behind: ZITO WELL NO 83044 (1909-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
21774.01909-08-131916-11-25 2.00.0 CIRR 72

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 249 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1990, came in at 47 AF — 19% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1980 559 11th lowest of 11 · 224% of median 141 2.0
1981 188 5th lowest of 11 · 76% of median 156 1.5
1982 78 4th lowest of 11 · 31% of median 125 0.5
1983 337 9th lowest of 11 · 135% of median 171 1.0
1984 294 8th lowest of 11 · 118% of median 157 2.0
1985 405 10th lowest of 11 · 163% of median 206 1.0
1986 289 7th lowest of 11 · 116% of median 179 1.0
1987 249 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 124 2.0
1988 57 3rd lowest of 11 · 23% of median 85 1.0
1989 41 1st lowest of 11 · 16% of median 99 0.2
1990 47 2nd lowest of 11 · 19% of median 236 0.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1679 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 76% of the irrigation seasons in 1980-1990 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.