← My Water · Print / save as PDF
CROOKED ARROYA DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 1700578 · 1 · CROOKED ARROYO · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:54 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1890-02-27 — 14th most senior of the 1909 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: POTTER IRRIGATING DITCH (1890-02-21). Immediately behind: OTERO CANAL (1890-03-03).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14668.0 | 1890-02-27 | 1905-04-08 | 2.4 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 12 |
| 20615.0 | 1906-06-11 | 1922-08-30 | 24.84 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 92 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 312 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2012, came in at 156 AF — 50% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 6,162 | 15th lowest of 15 · 1975% of median | 215 | 33.5 |
| 1999 | 3,451 | 14th lowest of 15 · 1106% of median | 231 | 20.5 |
| 2000 | 2,815 | 13th lowest of 15 · 902% of median | 191 | 32.7 |
| 2001 | 1,204 | 12th lowest of 15 · 386% of median | 156 | 13.4 |
| 2002 | 42 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 14% of median | 55 | 3.0 |
| 2003 | 67 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 22% of median | 16 | 8.8 |
| 2004 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 6 | 0.0 |
| 2005 | 94 | 4th lowest of 15 · 30% of median | 52 | 5.7 |
| 2006 | 111 | 5th lowest of 15 · 36% of median | 68 | 5.9 |
| 2007 | 312 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 153 | 4.4 |
| 2008 | 476 | 9th lowest of 15 · 153% of median | 148 | 5.0 |
| 2009 | 712 | 10th lowest of 15 · 228% of median | 77 | 14.6 |
| 2010 | 1,015 | 11th lowest of 15 · 325% of median | 133 | 10.6 |
| 2011 | 239 | 7th lowest of 15 · 77% of median | 79 | 4.4 |
| 2012 | 156 | 6th lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 75 | 1.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.