← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

REID DITCH NO 3

Structure dossier · WDID 1700691 · 1 · LITTLE HORSE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:35 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1939-12-311643rd most senior of the 1909 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: REID DITCH NO 2 (1939-12-31). Immediately behind: REID SPRING NO 1 (1946-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44194.328711939-12-311971-12-31 4.160.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 5 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 16 AF — 320% of that, and 11th lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2003 1 2nd lowest of 12 · 20% of median 2 0.8
2004 12 9th lowest of 12 · 240% of median 9 3.0
2006 2 4th lowest of 12 · 40% of median 4 0.9
2010 12 9th lowest of 12 · 240% of median 5 2.0
2011 20 12th lowest of 12 · 400% of median 5 4.0
2013 1 2nd lowest of 12 · 20% of median 2 0.3
2014 3 5th lowest of 12 · 60% of median 4 1.1
2017 6 8th lowest of 12 · 120% of median 4 2.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 2 0.2
2020 5 6th lowest of 12 · 100% of median 3 1.6
2021 5 6th lowest of 12 · 100% of median 2 2.5
2023 16 11th lowest of 12 · 320% of median 3 4.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record fragment 45 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history)
record continuity unknown record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days)
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.