← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PAIS DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 1800525 · 1 · APISHAPA RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1869-04-1020th most senior of the 367 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CORDOVA DITCH (1869-04-01). Immediately behind: JOSE M ARCHULETA DITCH (1869-05-04).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
7040.01869-04-101891-03-14 9.690.0 CIRR EXC-17

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 0 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — —% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 39 0.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 2 0.0
2013 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 13 0.0
2014 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 18 0.0
2015 6 11th lowest of 15 · —% of median 11 3.0
2016 212 14th lowest of 15 · —% of median 51 5.1
2017 128 13th lowest of 15 · —% of median 59 3.9
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 38 0.0
2019 272 15th lowest of 15 · —% of median 100 2.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 18 0.0
2021 115 12th lowest of 15 · —% of median 45 2.5
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 1 0.0
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 3 0.0
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 5 0.0
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 2 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.