← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SANCHES-QUINTANA DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 1900503 · 1 · PURGATOIRE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1870-03-0182nd most senior of the 735 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LUCERO DITCH (1870-02-26). Immediately behind: SARCILLO DITCH (1870-03-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
7365.01870-03-011903-08-10 0.80.0 CIRR 49

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 21 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 82 AF — 390% of that, and 14th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1975 32 11th lowest of 15 · 152% of median 22 0.8
1977 38 12th lowest of 15 · 181% of median 21 1.0
1978 22 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 15 0.8
1983 125 15th lowest of 15 · 595% of median 80 0.8
1984 66 13th lowest of 15 · 314% of median 43 1.0
1985 24 10th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 13 1.0
1991 21 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 14 0.8
2006 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2009 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2014 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2015 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2016 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2024 82 14th lowest of 15 · 390% of median 56 0.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 417 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 3% of the irrigation seasons in 1953-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.