← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BUTLER IRR D
Structure dossier · WDID 2000556 · 1 · RIO GRANDE · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1874-03-27 — 42nd most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PINOS CR D 1 (1873-12-31). Immediately behind: HUBBARD D (1874-03-27).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8852.0 | 1874-03-27 | 1896-05-01 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 30 |
| 8852.0 | 1874-03-27 | 1896-05-01 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 31 |
| 11783.0 | 1882-04-05 | 1896-05-01 | 4.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 218 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,588 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,510 AF — 95% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,261 | 1st lowest of 15 · 79% of median | 204 | 6.8 |
| 2012 | 1,494 | 6th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 217 | 6.8 |
| 2013 | 1,717 | 11th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 207 | 6.8 |
| 2014 | 1,744 | 12th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 215 | 6.8 |
| 2015 | 1,806 | 14th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 215 | 6.8 |
| 2016 | 1,707 | 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 221 | 6.8 |
| 2017 | 2,080 | 15th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | 215 | 6.8 |
| 2018 | 1,275 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 220 | 6.8 |
| 2019 | 1,771 | 13th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 213 | 6.8 |
| 2020 | 1,319 | 4th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 216 | 6.8 |
| 2021 | 1,470 | 5th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 216 | 6.8 |
| 2022 | 1,588 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 217 | 6.8 |
| 2023 | 1,604 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 222 | 6.8 |
| 2024 | 1,297 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 202 | 6.8 |
| 2025 | 1,510 | 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | 208 | 6.8 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.