← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

COCHRAN PIONEER D

Structure dossier · WDID 2000582 · 1 · RIO GRANDE · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1872-06-0919th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MACLEOD D 1R (1872-05-30). Immediately behind: HOMESTAKE MILLING MINING (1872-06-09).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
8196.01872-06-091896-05-01 3.00.0 CIRR 13

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,024 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,061 AF — 104% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 947 4th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 210 2.5
2012 1,066 14th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 215 2.5
2013 1,024 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 207 3.5
2014 997 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 215 2.5
2015 967 5th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 209 2.5
2016 986 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 275 2.5
2017 867 1st lowest of 15 · 85% of median 310 2.5
2018 1,057 12th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 223 2.5
2019 944 3rd lowest of 15 · 92% of median 213 2.5
2020 1,047 10th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 216 2.5
2021 874 2nd lowest of 15 · 85% of median 204 2.5
2022 1,041 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 216 2.5
2023 1,078 15th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 220 2.5
2024 1,056 11th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 216 2.5
2025 1,061 13th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 214 2.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.