← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

EWING D 1

Structure dossier · WDID 2000626 · 1 · EMBARGO CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1875-01-0175th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LEASE,DAVIS AND BINGLE D (1874-12-03). Immediately behind: ANNA RABER D (1875-03-31).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
9132.01875-01-011896-05-01 1.60.0 CIRR 72
9251.01875-04-301896-05-01 2.00.0 CIRR 80
9283.01875-06-011896-05-01 0.80.0 CIRR 94

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 867 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 925 AF — 107% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 415 2nd lowest of 15 · 48% of median 116 4.4
2012 840 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 161 4.4
2013 1,013 12th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 149 4.4
2014 1,218 13th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 203 4.4
2015 1,272 14th lowest of 15 · 147% of median 215 4.4
2016 1,283 15th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 224 4.4
2017 949 11th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 204 4.2
2018 677 4th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 223 3.6
2019 867 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 213 4.4
2020 350 1st lowest of 15 · 40% of median 213 3.4
2021 673 3rd lowest of 15 · 78% of median 214 4.1
2022 765 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 208 4.4
2023 895 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 217 4.0
2024 821 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 204 4.3
2025 925 10th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 214 4.4

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.