← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FARMERS CREEK D

Structure dossier · WDID 2000630 · 1 · FARMERS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:34 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1888-06-30714th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TROUT CR D (1888-04-30). Immediately behind: HOSSELKUS D (1889-04-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19456.140611888-06-301916-09-13 3.00.0 CIRR 1916-22

Recorded use (last 14 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 23 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2004, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1975 18 7th lowest of 14 · 78% of median 11 1.0
1979 60 12th lowest of 14 · 261% of median 14 3.0
1980 60 12th lowest of 14 · 261% of median 11 3.0
1992 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 2 0.0
1993 32 10th lowest of 14 · 139% of median 19 1.8
1994 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 4 0.0
1995 102 14th lowest of 14 · 444% of median 44 1.6
1996 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 3 0.0
1997 30 9th lowest of 14 · 130% of median 9 3.0
1998 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 3 0.0
1999 28 8th lowest of 14 · 122% of median 16 2.0
2001 42 11th lowest of 14 · 183% of median 11 3.0
2003 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2004 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 10 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record fragment 160 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history)
record continuity unknown record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days)
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.