Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ZEIGLER ROCK CR D
Structure dossier · WDID 2000915 · 1 · ROCK CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:03 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1929-10-15 — 2789th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PIONEER SEEPAGE D (1927-05-01). Immediately behind: FUCHS RES (1930-07-17).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32400.29142 | 1929-10-15 | 1960-01-27 | 4.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 1959-21 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 120 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 20 AF — 17% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 134 | 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 17 | 4.5 |
| 2011 | 34 | 5th lowest of 15 · 28% of median | 87 | 0.3 |
| 2012 | 365 | 12th lowest of 15 · 304% of median | 96 | 2.0 |
| 2013 | 222 | 10th lowest of 15 · 185% of median | 63 | 2.0 |
| 2014 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2015 | 9 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 8% of median | 4 | 4.5 |
| 2016 | 391 | 13th lowest of 15 · 326% of median | 108 | 4.5 |
| 2017 | 572 | 15th lowest of 15 · 477% of median | 116 | 4.5 |
| 2018 | 49 | 6th lowest of 15 · 41% of median | 42 | 1.5 |
| 2019 | 120 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 59 | 2.0 |
| 2021 | 472 | 14th lowest of 15 · 393% of median | 176 | 2.5 |
| 2022 | 1 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 1% of median | 15 | 0.1 |
| 2023 | 252 | 11th lowest of 15 · 210% of median | 73 | 4.5 |
| 2024 | 71 | 7th lowest of 15 · 59% of median | 23 | 2.0 |
| 2025 | 20 | 4th lowest of 15 · 17% of median | 12 | 2.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.