Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MACLEOD D 4R
Structure dossier · WDID 2000970 · 1 · SAN FRANCISCO CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1882-05-31 — 240th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SPRAGUE D (1882-05-31). Immediately behind: MARAJO D (1882-06-01).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11839.0 | 1882-05-31 | 1896-05-01 | 0.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 226 |
| 11839.0 | 1882-05-31 | 1896-05-01 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 229 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 35 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2017, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 76 | 9th lowest of 15 · 217% of median | 34 | 1.8 |
| 1993 | 121 | 15th lowest of 15 · 346% of median | 43 | 1.8 |
| 1994 | 23 | 6th lowest of 15 · 66% of median | 9 | 1.5 |
| 1997 | 14 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 40% of median | 8 | 1.0 |
| 1998 | 35 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 15 | 1.5 |
| 2004 | 22 | 5th lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 13 | 1.0 |
| 2005 | 24 | 7th lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 19 | 1.5 |
| 2007 | 107 | 13th lowest of 15 · 306% of median | 51 | 1.5 |
| 2008 | 113 | 14th lowest of 15 · 323% of median | 48 | 1.5 |
| 2009 | 80 | 10th lowest of 15 · 229% of median | 35 | 1.5 |
| 2010 | 86 | 11th lowest of 15 · 246% of median | 49 | 1.5 |
| 2014 | 12 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 34% of median | 20 | 0.5 |
| 2015 | 16 | 4th lowest of 15 · 46% of median | 32 | 2.0 |
| 2016 | 95 | 12th lowest of 15 · 271% of median | 37 | 1.5 |
| 2017 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 11 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.