Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
VOSS SEEPAGE D
Structure dossier · WDID 2001000 · 1 · RIO GRANDE · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1922-02-16 — 6812th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: W2998 WELL NO 02 (1920-12-31). Immediately behind: W2991 WELL NO 02 (1923-05-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44559.26344 | 1922-02-16 | 1972-12-31 | 10.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOMSTK |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 79 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2015, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 47 | 4th lowest of 15 · 60% of median | 89 | 1.0 |
| 2000 | 69 | 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 124 | 0.5 |
| 2001 | 74 | 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 133 | 1.0 |
| 2002 | 20 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 25% of median | 56 | 0.4 |
| 2003 | 59 | 5th lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 129 | 0.3 |
| 2004 | 79 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 177 | 0.3 |
| 2005 | 14 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 18% of median | 52 | 0.2 |
| 2006 | 80 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 152 | 0.8 |
| 2007 | 169 | 10th lowest of 15 · 214% of median | 89 | 1.5 |
| 2008 | 770 | 11th lowest of 15 · 975% of median | 194 | 3.0 |
| 2009 | 1,071 | 13th lowest of 15 · 1356% of median | 200 | 4.0 |
| 2010 | 1,131 | 14th lowest of 15 · 1432% of median | 192 | 3.5 |
| 2011 | 1,047 | 12th lowest of 15 · 1325% of median | 215 | 3.0 |
| 2014 | 1,294 | 15th lowest of 15 · 1638% of median | 213 | 5.0 |
| 2015 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.