← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

KIRKPATRICK (PRAIRIE D) RECHARGE PIT

Structure dossier · WDID 2002055 · RA · RIO GRANDE · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:15 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1885-01-05258th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SAN LUIS VALLEY CNL (1885-01-05). Immediately behind: KIRKPATRICK (SLV CANAL) RECHARGE PIT (1885-01-05).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12789.01885-01-051996-12-31 120.00.0 ARCH

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 264 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 198 AF — 75% of that, and 6th lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2014 343 8th lowest of 12 · 130% of median 91 6.5
2015 343 8th lowest of 12 · 130% of median 123 6.7
2016 362 10th lowest of 12 · 137% of median 366 6.2
2017 330 7th lowest of 12 · 125% of median 365 4.9
2018 36 1st lowest of 12 · 14% of median 365 3.0
2019 395 11th lowest of 12 · 150% of median 365 5.7
2020 140 2nd lowest of 12 · 53% of median 366 5.6
2021 142 3rd lowest of 12 · 54% of median 304 3.9
2022 143 5th lowest of 12 · 54% of median 32 7.5
2023 460 12th lowest of 12 · 174% of median 184 7.1
2024 142 3rd lowest of 12 · 54% of median 40 4.3
2025 198 6th lowest of 12 · 75% of median 68 7.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2669 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2014-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.