← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

J COOLEY AUG PLAN RECHARGE PIT

Structure dossier · WDID 2002082 · RA · RIO GRANDE · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:38 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1887-02-09283rd most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: W2625 WELL NO 07 (1887-01-01). Immediately behind: FARMERS UNION CNL (1887-04-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
13554.01887-02-092000-12-29 120.00.0 ARCH

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 120 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 60 AF — 50% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2004 63 4th lowest of 15 · 52% of median 65 2.1
2005 231 15th lowest of 15 · 192% of median 58 15.0
2006 81 5th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 56 6.7
2014 120 6th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 26 6.4
2015 120 6th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 122 7.0
2016 125 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 366 7.2
2017 125 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 365 4.8
2018 56 2nd lowest of 15 · 47% of median 365 5.1
2019 125 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 365 6.0
2020 7 1st lowest of 15 · 6% of median 305 3.4
2021 128 13th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 31 6.3
2022 122 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 20 6.5
2023 130 14th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 185 8.4
2024 120 6th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 214 10.6
2025 60 3rd lowest of 15 · 50% of median 26 2.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2589 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 52% of the irrigation seasons in 2002-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.