Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BEAVER PARK RES
Structure dossier · WDID 2003532 · 3 · BEAVER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:39 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1910-04-30 — 964th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: W1230 WELL NO 03 (1910-04-21). Immediately behind: W0920 WELL NO 23 (1910-04-30).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22034.0 | 1910-04-30 | 1916-09-13 | 4434.0 | 0.0 | A | IRR | 1916-77A |
| 35193.0 | 1946-05-10 | 1960-01-27 | 324.4 | 0.0 | A | IRRRECFIS | 1959-13 |
Legal record & documents
2 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
CA2673, 09/13/1916.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA2673 | 1 | 1960-01-27 | S |
09/13/1916 | 1 | 1916-09-13 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,943 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,943 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,359 | 5th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 2,015 | 150 | 86.0 |
| 2012 | 212 | 1st lowest of 15 · 11% of median | 2,251 | 52 | 26.8 |
| 2013 | 1,079 | 4th lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 2,463 | 144 | 53.5 |
| 2014 | 400 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 21% of median | 3,056 | 2 | 201.7 |
| 2015 | 865 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 44% of median | 155 | 203 | 16.0 |
| 2016 | 2,468 | 10th lowest of 15 · 127% of median | 3,388 | 366 | 119.0 |
| 2017 | 1,452 | 6th lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 4,133 | 365 | 107.2 |
| 2018 | 3,100 | 12th lowest of 15 · 160% of median | 4,942 | 365 | 201.7 |
| 2019 | 5,314 | 15th lowest of 15 · 274% of median | 9,445 | 365 | 302.5 |
| 2020 | 3,737 | 14th lowest of 15 · 192% of median | 5,592 | 366 | 166.8 |
| 2021 | 1,627 | 7th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 5,056 | 365 | 87.6 |
| 2022 | 2,919 | 11th lowest of 15 · 150% of median | 4,861 | 365 | 195.3 |
| 2023 | 3,150 | 13th lowest of 15 · 162% of median | 5,272 | 365 | 101.3 |
| 2024 | 2,224 | 9th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 4,816 | 366 | 160.5 |
| 2025 | 1,943 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 3,461 | 304 | 89.2 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is rising over its last 15 recorded years (+151 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.029).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 7095 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 54% of the irrigation seasons in 1964-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.