← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

RITO HONDO RES

Structure dossier · WDID 2003588 · 3 · RITO HONDO CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:22 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1954-10-045593rd most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: STILLINGS D NO 1 (1945-06-02). Immediately behind: BIG MEADOWS RES (1959-08-27).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
40940.382621954-10-041972-04-21 561.460.0 ARECFIS 1969-5A

Recorded use (last 9 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 90 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 452 AF — 502% of that, and 7th lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
1999 5 4th lowest of 9 · 6% of median 5 2 2.5
2000 561 9th lowest of 9 · 623% of median 561 2 282.8
2018 0 1st lowest of 9 · 0% of median 0 61 0.0
2019 106 6th lowest of 9 · 118% of median 561 365 2.5
2020 456 8th lowest of 9 · 507% of median 561 366 2.5
2021 0 1st lowest of 9 · 0% of median 0 365 0.0
2022 90 5th lowest of 9 · 100% of median 90 365 7.4
2023 0 1st lowest of 9 · 0% of median 0 365 0.0
2024 452 7th lowest of 9 · 502% of median 305 17.6

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2196 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 41% of the irrigation seasons in 1999-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.