← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

NORLAND D

Structure dossier · WDID 2100570 · 1 · ALAMOSA RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:14 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1885-06-1267th most senior of the 1041 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: W0491 WELL NO 03 (1884-04-15). Immediately behind: LOWLAND OVERFLOW NORTH BRANCH (1885-10-05).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12947.01885-06-121888-07-11 48.560.0 CIRRDOM 68

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,086 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 1,609 13th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 53 37.7
2010 1,085 6th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 40 24.5
2011 552 5th lowest of 15 · 51% of median 18 21.3
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2013 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2014 1,085 6th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 18 44.1
2015 1,086 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 15 48.5
2016 1,717 14th lowest of 15 · 158% of median 37 48.6
2017 1,363 12th lowest of 15 · 126% of median 56 35.0
2019 1,311 11th lowest of 15 · 121% of median 71 30.0
2021 1,099 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 22 30.0
2022 1,188 10th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 26 38.0
2023 2,903 15th lowest of 15 · 267% of median 57 38.2
2024 224 4th lowest of 15 · 21% of median 9 30.0
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 12 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.