Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ANGUSTURA D

Structure dossier · WDID 2200503 · 1 · CONEJOS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1883-04-01 — 104th most senior of the 1764 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: W1180 WELL NO 02 (1883-03-17). Immediately behind: ELLEDGES D (1883-04-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12144.01883-04-011883-10-22 26.00.0 CIRRDOM 65

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,067 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 990 AF — 93% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 984 6th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 33 16.0
2012 528 2nd lowest of 15 · 50% of median 21 26.0
2013 228 1st lowest of 15 · 21% of median 12 23.0
2014 833 4th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 23 26.0
2015 1,076 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 22 26.0
2016 1,692 11th lowest of 15 · 159% of median 36 26.0
2017 2,446 13th lowest of 15 · 229% of median 52 26.0
2018 716 3rd lowest of 15 · 67% of median 18 26.0
2019 2,920 14th lowest of 15 · 274% of median 66 28.0
2020 1,067 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 25 26.0
2021 1,960 12th lowest of 15 · 184% of median 41 26.0
2022 1,473 10th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 32 26.0
2023 2,940 15th lowest of 15 · 276% of median 58 26.0
2024 920 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 31 16.0
2025 990 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 36 22.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.