← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BRAIDEN OVERFLOW D NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 2200515 · 1 · RIO SAN ANTONIO · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1889-09-01167th most senior of the 1764 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: W1637 WELL NO 04 (1890-07-10). Immediately behind: BRAIDEN OVERFLOW D NO 2 (1889-09-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
14886.144891889-09-011914-01-14 15.00.0 CIRR 146

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 184 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 774 AF — 421% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2006 56 4th lowest of 15 · 30% of median 23 7.0
2007 184 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 37 7.0
2008 628 13th lowest of 15 · 341% of median 42 12.0
2009 379 12th lowest of 15 · 206% of median 45 7.0
2010 28 3rd lowest of 15 · 15% of median 16 4.0
2011 119 7th lowest of 15 · 65% of median 17 15.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 16 0.0
2014 242 11th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 16 15.0
2015 190 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 11 15.0
2016 113 6th lowest of 15 · 61% of median 8 10.0
2017 659 14th lowest of 15 · 358% of median 31 15.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2019 239 10th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 16 12.0
2022 61 5th lowest of 15 · 33% of median 4 15.0
2023 774 15th lowest of 15 · 421% of median 28 15.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.