Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SOUDERS WOLFE D 5
Structure dossier · WDID 2300506 · DITCH · SOUTH FORK SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:29 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1887-06-20 — 732nd most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 2300504 (1887-06-01). Immediately behind: 2300763 (1887-07-09).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13685.0 | 1887-06-20 | 1889-10-18 | 2.55 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
1 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
CA0341.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA0341 | 1 | 1889-10-18 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 182 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 210 AF — 115% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 182 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 47 | 2.0 |
| 2005 | 129 | 4th lowest of 15 · 71% of median | 66 | 1.0 |
| 2012 | 17 | 1st lowest of 15 · 9% of median | 23 | 0.5 |
| 2013 | 270 | 11th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | 58 | 2.5 |
| 2014 | 407 | 14th lowest of 15 · 224% of median | 150 | 2.6 |
| 2015 | 547 | 15th lowest of 15 · 300% of median | 121 | 2.5 |
| 2016 | 181 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 41 | 2.5 |
| 2017 | 336 | 13th lowest of 15 · 185% of median | 87 | 2.5 |
| 2018 | 87 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 37 | 2.1 |
| 2019 | 160 | 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 73 | 1.5 |
| 2020 | 144 | 5th lowest of 15 · 79% of median | 35 | 2.5 |
| 2021 | 228 | 10th lowest of 15 · 125% of median | 54 | 2.5 |
| 2022 | 61 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 34% of median | 22 | 2.1 |
| 2023 | 332 | 12th lowest of 15 · 182% of median | 75 | 2.6 |
| 2024 | 210 | 9th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 54 | 2.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2086 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 13% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.