Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
2300694
Structure dossier · WDID 2300694 · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 01:19 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1867-07-15 — 243rd most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 8003672 (1867-07-01). Immediately behind: 0801230 (1867-08-30).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6405.0 | 1867-07-15 | 1889-10-18 | 35.39 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
3 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
W8345, CA3374, CA0341.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
W8345 | 1 | 1889-10-18 | O |
CA3374 | 1 | 1889-10-18 | O |
CA0341 | 1 | 1889-10-18 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,751 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1978, came in at 10 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1958 | 3,320 | 9th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 57 | 32.0 |
| 1959 | 2,751 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 68 | 30.5 |
| 1960 | 3,530 | 11th lowest of 15 · 128% of median | 67 | 41.6 |
| 1961 | 3,374 | 10th lowest of 15 · 123% of median | 54 | 40.0 |
| 1962 | 3,816 | 14th lowest of 15 · 139% of median | 67 | 38.0 |
| 1963 | 541 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 20% of median | 16 | 28.0 |
| 1964 | 3,738 | 12th lowest of 15 · 136% of median | 62 | 33.0 |
| 1971 | 3,936 | 15th lowest of 15 · 143% of median | 50 | 40.5 |
| 1972 | 364 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 13% of median | 26 | 7.9 |
| 1973 | 1,453 | 4th lowest of 15 · 53% of median | 36 | 49.8 |
| 1974 | 2,452 | 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 96 | 20.0 |
| 1975 | 1,458 | 5th lowest of 15 · 53% of median | 46 | 21.0 |
| 1976 | 3,783 | 13th lowest of 15 · 138% of median | 123 | 21.0 |
| 1977 | 2,195 | 6th lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 63 | 36.0 |
| 1978 | 10 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 25 | 0.6 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | partial | missing name, structure type, water source |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1287 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 21% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-1978 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.