← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

2300714

Structure dossier · WDID 2300714 · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Current administration

● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1879-05-15581st most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 2300879 (1879-05-10). Immediately behind: 2300668 (1879-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
10727.01879-05-151889-10-18 67.20.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 517 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1980, came in at 167 AF — 32% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1953 1,611 14th lowest of 15 · 312% of median 77 20.0
1955 60 2nd lowest of 15 · 12% of median 3 15.0
1956 912 10th lowest of 15 · 176% of median 17 30.0
1957 4,114 15th lowest of 15 · 796% of median 96 30.0
1958 1,069 13th lowest of 15 · 207% of median 44 25.0
1959 1,032 12th lowest of 15 · 200% of median 25 25.1
1960 517 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 16 21.0
1961 457 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 37 12.1
1962 595 9th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 27 12.0
1963 99 3rd lowest of 15 · 19% of median 11 5.0
1971 253 6th lowest of 15 · 49% of median 134 1.0
1976 952 11th lowest of 15 · 184% of median 104 5.0
1978 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
1979 159 4th lowest of 15 · 31% of median 41 2.0
1980 167 5th lowest of 15 · 32% of median 16 6.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity partial missing name, structure type, water source
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 738 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 11% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-1980 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.