← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

2301001

Structure dossier · WDID 2301001 · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 04:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Current administration

● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1888-06-25754th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 2300511 (1888-06-01). Immediately behind: 2301080 (1888-06-25).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
14056.01888-06-251889-10-18 23.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 214 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1976, came in at 60 AF — 28% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1951 417 12th lowest of 15 · 195% of median 55 6.0
1952 369 10th lowest of 15 · 172% of median 35 6.0
1954 101 4th lowest of 15 · 47% of median 35 2.5
1956 65 3rd lowest of 15 · 30% of median 12 3.0
1957 214 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 19 6.0
1958 179 7th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 31 6.0
1959 107 5th lowest of 15 · 50% of median 28 4.0
1960 401 11th lowest of 15 · 187% of median 56 5.0
1961 44 1st lowest of 15 · 21% of median 19 5.0
1962 149 6th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 50 3.0
1970 3,714 15th lowest of 15 · 1736% of median 83 25.0
1971 342 9th lowest of 15 · 160% of median 122 2.4
1972 609 13th lowest of 15 · 285% of median 113 3.1
1975 1,004 14th lowest of 15 · 469% of median 79 9.0
1976 60 2nd lowest of 15 · 28% of median 18 3.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity partial missing name, structure type, water source
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 784 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 14% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-1976 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.