Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
2301006
Structure dossier · WDID 2301006 · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:49 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1885-12-31 — 714th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 2300992 (1885-12-31). Immediately behind: 2303961 (1885-12-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13149.0 | 1885-12-31 | 1913-05-22 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | STK |
Legal record & documents
4 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
CA1636, W7936, CA0341.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA1636 | 1 | 1913-05-22 | O |
W7936 | 2 | 1889-10-18 | O |
CA0341 | 1 | 1889-10-18 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 916 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1976, came in at 896 AF — 98% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1955 | 60 | 1st lowest of 15 · 7% of median | 7 | 5.0 |
| 1956 | 553 | 6th lowest of 15 · 60% of median | 28 | 11.0 |
| 1957 | 946 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 58 | 9.0 |
| 1958 | 543 | 5th lowest of 15 · 59% of median | 39 | 8.0 |
| 1959 | 405 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 44% of median | 25 | 9.7 |
| 1960 | 2,335 | 14th lowest of 15 · 255% of median | 165 | 11.0 |
| 1961 | 67 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 7% of median | 18 | 2.0 |
| 1962 | 466 | 4th lowest of 15 · 51% of median | 40 | 7.0 |
| 1969 | 2,374 | 15th lowest of 15 · 259% of median | 162 | 12.0 |
| 1970 | 1,822 | 12th lowest of 15 · 199% of median | 84 | 11.1 |
| 1971 | 1,585 | 11th lowest of 15 · 173% of median | 78 | 12.4 |
| 1972 | 1,568 | 10th lowest of 15 · 171% of median | 115 | 11.1 |
| 1973 | 1,970 | 13th lowest of 15 · 215% of median | 116 | 14.2 |
| 1975 | 916 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 65 | 11.0 |
| 1976 | 896 | 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | 71 | 12.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | partial | missing name, structure type, water source |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1342 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 24% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-1976 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.