← My Water · Print / save as PDF
A A SALAZAR D 2
Structure dossier · WDID 2400501 · 1 · RITO SECO · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1852-04-10 — 2nd most senior of the 453 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: A A SALAZAR D 1 (1852-04-10). Immediately behind: SALAZAR D (1852-04-10).
Decreed rights (8)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 831.0 | 1852-04-10 | 1889-06-14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRRECFISSTKAUGOTHWLD | 1 |
| 14410.02922 | 1857-12-31 | 1905-12-14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRRECFISSTKAUGOTHWLD | 25 |
| 14410.04018 | 1860-12-31 | 1905-12-14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRRECFISSTKAUGOTHWLD | 27 |
| 16932.0 | 1896-05-10 | 1905-12-14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRRECFISSTKAUGOTHWLD | 57 |
| 19734.0 | 1904-01-12 | 1905-12-14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRRECFISSTKAUGOTHWLD | 62 |
| 24550.0 | 1917-03-20 | 1935-02-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRRECFISSTKAUGOTHWLD | 1934-22 |
| 24562.0 | 1917-04-01 | 1935-02-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRRECFISSTKAUGOTHWLD | 1934-23 |
| 24927.0 | 1918-04-01 | 1935-02-11 | 6.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRRECFISSTKAUGOTHWLD | 1934-27 |
Recorded use (last 13 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 496 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1984, came in at 423 AF — 85% of that, and 4th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1952 | 682 | 10th lowest of 13 · 138% of median | 184 | 2.0 |
| 1953 | 684 | 11th lowest of 13 · 138% of median | 225 | 3.0 |
| 1954 | 496 | 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median | 134 | 2.0 |
| 1956 | 79 | 1st lowest of 13 · 16% of median | 61 | 0.6 |
| 1957 | 978 | 13th lowest of 13 · 197% of median | 214 | 4.0 |
| 1958 | 161 | 2nd lowest of 13 · 32% of median | 21 | 8.0 |
| 1959 | 587 | 8th lowest of 13 · 118% of median | 135 | 5.0 |
| 1963 | 847 | 12th lowest of 13 · 171% of median | 214 | 4.0 |
| 1978 | 161 | 2nd lowest of 13 · 32% of median | 22 | 5.0 |
| 1980 | 486 | 5th lowest of 13 · 98% of median | 88 | 4.0 |
| 1982 | 492 | 6th lowest of 13 · 99% of median | 131 | 5.0 |
| 1983 | 626 | 9th lowest of 13 · 126% of median | 72 | 5.4 |
| 1984 | 423 | 4th lowest of 13 · 85% of median | 162 | 4.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.