← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BACA GRANT 4 IRR D 13

Structure dossier · WDID 2500517 · 1 · NORTH CRESTONE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1870-05-0116th most senior of the 847 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BACA GRANT 4 IRR D 12 (1870-05-01). Immediately behind: HALL D 1 (1870-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
7426.01870-05-011890-03-28 5.40.0 CIRR 9

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 100 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 246 AF — 246% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 7 0.0
2013 325 11th lowest of 15 · 325% of median 76 2.8
2014 461 12th lowest of 15 · 461% of median 45 5.4
2015 1,309 15th lowest of 15 · 1309% of median 73 10.0
2016 57 7th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 59 0.5
2017 700 13th lowest of 15 · 700% of median 100 4.5
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 16 0.0
2020 179 9th lowest of 15 · 179% of median 68 2.5
2021 100 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 37 2.5
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 11 0.0
2023 18 6th lowest of 15 · 18% of median 35 0.7
2024 925 14th lowest of 15 · 925% of median 214 9.5
2025 246 10th lowest of 15 · 246% of median 64 4.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1670 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 23% of the irrigation seasons in 1992-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.