← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CLAYTON D D

Structure dossier · WDID 2500541 · 1 · KERBER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1872-03-2556th most senior of the 847 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORTH,MIDDLE & TOP SPGS (1871-05-01). Immediately behind: CLAYTON D E (1872-03-25).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
8120.01872-03-251890-03-28 3.40.0 CIRR 19

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 591 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 197 AF — 33% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 591 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 100 3.4
2012 287 2nd lowest of 15 · 49% of median 104 2.7
2013 470 6th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 129 3.4
2014 732 9th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 162 3.4
2015 1,007 15th lowest of 15 · 170% of median 270 3.2
2016 872 12th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 280 3.4
2017 815 10th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 338 1.8
2018 390 5th lowest of 15 · 66% of median 153 3.4
2019 1,004 14th lowest of 15 · 170% of median 258 3.4
2020 819 11th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 254 3.0
2021 896 13th lowest of 15 · 152% of median 317 3.4
2022 521 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 220 3.0
2023 356 4th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 92 4.1
2024 291 3rd lowest of 15 · 49% of median 121 2.3
2025 197 1st lowest of 15 · 33% of median 79 3.7

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.