Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HAYDEN CR D

Structure dossier · WDID 2500585 · 1 · HAYDEN PASS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:57 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1905-06-01 — 191st most senior of the 847 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: W2312 WELL NO 01 (1902-12-31). Immediately behind: SILVER D 2 (1905-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
20240.01905-06-011914-06-09 4.00.0 CIRR 137

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 145 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1993, came in at 80 AF — 55% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1979 211 14th lowest of 15 · 146% of median 260 1.0
1980 230 15th lowest of 15 · 159% of median 279 1.0
1981 125 7th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 253 0.2
1982 156 11th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 220 1.0
1983 145 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 196 1.0
1984 164 12th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 237 0.5
1985 190 13th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 304 0.5
1986 154 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 253 0.5
1987 147 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 231 0.5
1988 121 6th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 235 0.5
1989 75 3rd lowest of 15 · 52% of median 189 0.4
1990 9 2nd lowest of 15 · 6% of median 44 0.1
1991 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
1992 103 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median 27 2.0
1993 80 4th lowest of 15 · 55% of median 33 1.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 4210 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 97% of the irrigation seasons in 1973-1993 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.