Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
RESERVOIR ENRL D
Structure dossier · WDID 2600653 · 1 · SAGUACHE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:34 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1867-05-01 — 16th most senior of the 1548 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LAWRENCE D 3 (1867-05-01). Immediately behind: GREEN EARTH AUG PLAN (1867-05-01).
Decreed rights (8)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6330.0 | 1867-05-01 | 1889-11-23 | 2.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 7 |
| 6666.0 | 1868-04-01 | 1889-11-23 | 0.6 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 9 |
| 7780.0 | 1871-04-20 | 1889-11-23 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 19 |
| 7883.0 | 1871-08-01 | 1889-11-23 | 3.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 23 |
| 8157.0 | 1872-05-01 | 1889-11-23 | 1.4 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 27 |
| 8541.0 | 1873-05-20 | 1889-11-23 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 37 |
| 8896.0 | 1874-05-10 | 1889-11-23 | 1.04 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 46 |
| 10348.0 | 1878-05-01 | 1889-11-23 | 4.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 76 |
Legal record & documents
12 decreed actions on record across
7 court cases:
CA1153, CA1147, CA0795, CA0720, CA0674, CA0610, 01CW0030.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA1153 | 3 | 1889-11-23 | O |
CA1147 | 1 | 1889-11-23 | O |
CA0795 | 1 | 1889-11-23 | O |
CA0720 | 1 | 1889-11-23 | O |
CA0674 | 1 | 1889-11-23 | O |
CA0610 | 4 | 1889-11-23 | O |
01CW0030 | 1 | 1889-11-23 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,776 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,613 AF — 91% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,316 | 5th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 215 | 8.4 |
| 2012 | 1,026 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 58% of median | 194 | 3.7 |
| 2013 | 1,525 | 6th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 213 | 5.4 |
| 2014 | 2,401 | 11th lowest of 15 · 135% of median | 196 | 10.2 |
| 2015 | 2,863 | 13th lowest of 15 · 161% of median | 185 | 16.6 |
| 2016 | 4,813 | 15th lowest of 15 · 271% of median | 208 | 13.9 |
| 2017 | 3,737 | 14th lowest of 15 · 210% of median | 214 | 11.3 |
| 2018 | 728 | 1st lowest of 15 · 41% of median | 163 | 3.4 |
| 2019 | 2,441 | 12th lowest of 15 · 137% of median | 209 | 11.8 |
| 2020 | 1,228 | 4th lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 216 | 3.4 |
| 2021 | 1,211 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 214 | 3.4 |
| 2022 | 1,776 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 201 | 8.6 |
| 2023 | 1,997 | 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 217 | 12.0 |
| 2024 | 1,988 | 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 202 | 9.6 |
| 2025 | 1,613 | 7th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 210 | 11.1 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 8 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 15862 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 98% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.