← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

VAN ALLEN D

Structure dossier · WDID 2600690 · 1 · NORTH FORK SAGUACHE CREE · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 05:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1872-05-0160th most senior of the 1548 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SHEEP CREEK D (1872-05-01). Immediately behind: HOUGLAND CREEK D (1872-05-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
8157.01872-05-011889-11-23 1.20.0 CIRR 27

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 235 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 115 AF — 49% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 246 10th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 74 6.0
2010 99 1st lowest of 15 · 42% of median 102 1.2
2011 141 4th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 85 3.0
2012 120 3rd lowest of 15 · 51% of median 94 1.2
2013 191 5th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 139 1.2
2014 192 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 196 1.2
2015 235 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 51 3.9
2016 1,002 15th lowest of 15 · 426% of median 170 8.0
2017 214 7th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 126 1.2
2018 550 14th lowest of 15 · 234% of median 221 3.5
2019 420 11th lowest of 15 · 179% of median 209 2.4
2020 462 13th lowest of 15 · 197% of median 216 2.8
2021 460 12th lowest of 15 · 196% of median 216 2.8
2022 240 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 197 1.2
2024 115 2nd lowest of 15 · 49% of median 79 1.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 6002 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 39% of the irrigation seasons in 1953-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.