← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CRARYS LOS PINOS DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 2800539 · 1 · LOS PINOS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:00 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1888-10-13142nd most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KENDALL NO. 1 DITCH (1888-09-15). Immediately behind: LEAHY DITCH (1889-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16192.141661888-10-131904-04-29 2.50.0 CIRR 101

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 453 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2003, came in at 44 AF — 10% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1988 271 5th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 62 3.0
1989 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0
1990 1,523 15th lowest of 15 · 336% of median 87 12.0
1991 1,071 13th lowest of 15 · 236% of median 62 10.0
1992 785 11th lowest of 15 · 173% of median 95 6.0
1993 627 10th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 84 4.0
1994 453 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 72 4.2
1995 1,349 14th lowest of 15 · 298% of median 66 11.0
1996 314 6th lowest of 15 · 69% of median 59 3.0
1997 601 9th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 74 6.0
1999 452 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 63 6.0
2000 846 12th lowest of 15 · 187% of median 99 6.0
2001 95 3rd lowest of 15 · 21% of median 28 2.0
2002 99 4th lowest of 15 · 22% of median 68 1.0
2003 44 2nd lowest of 15 · 10% of median 107 0.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.