Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MEANS BROS. NO. 4 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 2800645 · 1 · MARSHALL CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1891-05-01 — 165th most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SIGNAL PK IP WELL F1 L15 (1890-05-01). Immediately behind: MEANS BROS. NO. 6 DITCH (1891-05-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16192.15096 | 1891-05-01 | 1904-04-29 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 109 |
Legal record & documents
4 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
W2753, CA1266, 15CW0017.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
W2753 | 1 | 1904-04-29 | S |
CA1266 | 1 | 1904-04-29 | S |
15CW0017 | 2 | 1904-04-29 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,553 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,908 AF — 123% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 285 | 1st lowest of 15 · 18% of median | 70 | 2.8 |
| 2012 | 395 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 25% of median | 43 | 5.3 |
| 2013 | 379 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 24% of median | 91 | 4.6 |
| 2014 | 669 | 4th lowest of 15 · 43% of median | 62 | 5.6 |
| 2015 | 1,253 | 6th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 66 | 10.6 |
| 2016 | 1,346 | 7th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 83 | 13.2 |
| 2017 | 2,330 | 11th lowest of 15 · 150% of median | 100 | 15.6 |
| 2018 | 1,553 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 96 | 10.6 |
| 2019 | 817 | 5th lowest of 15 · 53% of median | 56 | 10.6 |
| 2020 | 2,794 | 13th lowest of 15 · 180% of median | 113 | 19.9 |
| 2021 | 2,226 | 10th lowest of 15 · 143% of median | 91 | 15.6 |
| 2022 | 2,577 | 12th lowest of 15 · 166% of median | 99 | 15.3 |
| 2023 | 2,989 | 14th lowest of 15 · 192% of median | 108 | 21.6 |
| 2024 | 3,171 | 15th lowest of 15 · 204% of median | 111 | 22.0 |
| 2025 | 1,908 | 9th lowest of 15 · 123% of median | 77 | 19.9 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is rising over its last 15 recorded years (+217 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.000).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 4406 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 37% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.