← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

TARKINGTON DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 2800704 · 1 · GOLD CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:33 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1891-05-10654th most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SPRUCE CREEK DITCH (1885-05-15). Immediately behind: TARKINGTON DITCH ALT PT (1891-05-10).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
28311.151051891-05-101943-04-19 17.9210.0 CIRR 261
44925.184141900-06-011973-12-31 0.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,613 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,765 AF — 109% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 1,909 11th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 140 13.3
2012 1,547 5th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 144 10.0
2013 1,255 2nd lowest of 15 · 78% of median 127 8.9
2014 2,025 13th lowest of 15 · 126% of median 134 11.0
2015 918 1st lowest of 15 · 57% of median 86 9.7
2016 1,394 3rd lowest of 15 · 86% of median 107 11.6
2017 1,666 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 90 10.3
2018 2,176 14th lowest of 15 · 135% of median 180 10.0
2019 1,456 4th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 120 10.0
2020 1,613 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 90 12.3
2021 1,911 12th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 130 10.0
2022 1,569 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 97 12.0
2023 1,592 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 112 12.0
2024 2,188 15th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 141 12.0
2025 1,765 10th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 136 12.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.