← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WATERMAN METROZ DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 2800711 · 1 · QUARTZ CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1900-04-10659th most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RAUSIS NO 2 DITCH (1898-04-18). Immediately behind: ROCK SLIDE SPRING DITCH (1900-05-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
28311.183621900-04-101943-04-19 12.00.0 CIRRAUG 276

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,072 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,101 AF — 103% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 1,319 13th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 97 10.3
2012 165 2nd lowest of 15 · 15% of median 50 3.0
2013 639 4th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 52 8.8
2014 1,072 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 72 10.0
2015 1,481 14th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 46 25.0
2016 745 6th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 76 6.8
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 7 0.0
2018 568 3rd lowest of 15 · 53% of median 111 4.7
2019 1,303 12th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 72 16.9
2020 1,208 10th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 97 7.3
2021 1,723 15th lowest of 15 · 161% of median 97 11.6
2022 823 7th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 70 7.6
2023 1,281 11th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 99 10.6
2024 678 5th lowest of 15 · 63% of median 52 7.6
2025 1,101 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 106 6.8

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.