← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HIRDMAN DITCH NO 2

Structure dossier · WDID 2801273 · 1 · RAZOR CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:29 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1879-05-257th most senior of the 1505 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PIONEER DITCH (1878-05-31). Immediately behind: HIRDMAN DITCH NO 3 (1879-05-31).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
10737.01879-05-251894-05-01 2.010.0 CIRR 96
10743.01879-05-311894-05-01 0.00.0 CIRR 8
28311.107431879-05-311943-04-19 0.00.0 CIRR 209

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 361 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 254 AF — 70% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 361 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 79 4.3
2011 505 11th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 139 5.6
2012 180 3rd lowest of 15 · 50% of median 61 2.6
2013 391 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 127 2.8
2014 737 13th lowest of 15 · 204% of median 61 6.2
2015 699 12th lowest of 15 · 194% of median 77 5.6
2016 1,002 14th lowest of 15 · 278% of median 181 8.8
2017 1,011 15th lowest of 15 · 280% of median 89 9.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2020 399 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 71 3.8
2021 170 2nd lowest of 15 · 47% of median 48 3.5
2022 314 7th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 83 2.8
2023 218 4th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 42 3.5
2024 298 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 80 2.3
2025 254 5th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 82 1.6

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.