← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LAKE FORK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 2900643 · 1 · EAST FORK SAN JUAN RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1950-06-15252nd most senior of the 853 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JOE IRRIGATION DITCH PMP (1948-10-31). Immediately behind: H J WRIGHT R L BRIAR D 1 (1950-06-25).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
36690.01950-06-151962-04-19 1.00.0 CIRR #342

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 37 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 37 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 74 12th lowest of 15 · 200% of median 84 0.7
2012 104 15th lowest of 15 · 281% of median 114 0.9
2013 66 10th lowest of 15 · 178% of median 59 0.8
2014 96 14th lowest of 15 · 260% of median 92 0.8
2015 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 12 0.0
2016 58 9th lowest of 15 · 157% of median 75 0.8
2017 84 13th lowest of 15 · 227% of median 82 1.7
2018 71 11th lowest of 15 · 192% of median 88 1.2
2019 9 6th lowest of 15 · 24% of median 48 0.1
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2021 11 7th lowest of 15 · 30% of median 30 0.2
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 7 0.0
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 9 0.0
2025 37 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 30 1.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3512 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 27% of the irrigation seasons in 1964-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.