← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MURPHY DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 2900672 · 1 · EAST FORK SAN JUAN RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1940-05-18222nd most senior of the 853 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LANE CREEK DITCH (1940-05-17). Immediately behind: SPILER CANYON RES FEEDER (1940-09-23).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
33010.01940-05-181962-04-19 3.00.0 CIRRDOM #319

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 209 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 622 AF — 298% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 889 15th lowest of 15 · 425% of median 107 6.9
2012 714 14th lowest of 15 · 342% of median 68 8.2
2013 228 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 46 5.2
2014 253 10th lowest of 15 · 121% of median 21 12.7
2015 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 12 0.0
2016 539 12th lowest of 15 · 258% of median 80 12.3
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 7 0.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2021 528 11th lowest of 15 · 253% of median 52 5.7
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 7 0.0
2023 209 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 19 11.7
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0
2025 622 13th lowest of 15 · 298% of median 76 9.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2261 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 17% of the irrigation seasons in 1964-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.