← My Water · Print / save as PDF
OBANNON DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 2900677 · 1 · SAN JUAN RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:30 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1909-05-20 — 167th most senior of the 853 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HARRIS DITCH (1907-06-01). Immediately behind: OLD STRONG DITCH (1909-05-20).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22962.21689 | 1909-05-20 | 1928-06-05 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG | #199 |
| 24606.0 | 1917-05-15 | 1928-06-05 | 0.001 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG | #215 |
| 41016.33754 | 1942-06-01 | 1968-12-19 | 2.447 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | 68-83 |
| 42931.0 | 1967-07-17 | 1968-12-19 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG | 68-311 |
| 50769.4994 | 1986-09-24 | 1989-12-31 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,590 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,127 AF — 71% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,262 | 4th lowest of 15 · 79% of median | — | 173 | 6.8 |
| 2012 | 1,835 | 10th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | — | 204 | 7.4 |
| 2013 | 1,524 | 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | — | 161 | 6.9 |
| 2014 | 1,590 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 157 | 7.8 |
| 2015 | 1,888 | 11th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | — | 213 | 7.4 |
| 2016 | 1,774 | 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | — | 190 | 6.0 |
| 2017 | 2,079 | 12th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | — | 181 | 8.2 |
| 2018 | 1,588 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 214 | 7.2 |
| 2019 | 873 | 1st lowest of 15 · 55% of median | — | 143 | 4.4 |
| 2020 | 2,347 | 15th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | — | 234 | 7.4 |
| 2021 | 2,127 | 14th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | — | 306 | 7.4 |
| 2022 | 1,469 | 5th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | — | 172 | 7.4 |
| 2023 | 2,090 | 13th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | — | 177 | 10.6 |
| 2024 | 952 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 60% of median | — | 164 | 4.1 |
| 2025 | 1,127 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 71% of median | — | 185 | 6.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.