← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

REID DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3000617 · 1 · ANIMAS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1876-01-01108th most senior of the 2277 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WATERFALL DITCH AP (1875-10-10). Immediately behind: WALLACE DITCH (1876-01-01).

Decreed rights (12)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
9497.01876-01-011923-11-08 0.00.0 CIRR A-3
11063.01880-04-151923-11-08 2.50.0 CIRR A-10
11424.01881-04-111923-11-08 3.50.0 CIRR A-12
11794.01882-04-161923-11-08 39.00.0 CIRR A-14
42448.351891946-05-061968-05-03 0.00.0 CIRR 68-37
42448.381371954-06-011968-05-03 10.00.0 CIRR 68-55
49308.48831983-09-101985-12-31 0.250.0 CIRR
50537.01988-05-131988-12-31 0.780.0 CIRRFIS
52595.472361979-04-301994-12-31 0.0560.0 CIRR
55517.554572001-11-012002-12-31 0.10.0 CIRR
56978.169341896-05-122006-12-31 0.890.0 CIRR
57031.02006-02-222006-12-31 7.350.0 CSTOIRRRECFISFIRSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 29,907 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 30,177 AF — 101% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 25,500 4th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 4,955 365 60.7
2012 31,444 11th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 4,308 366 74.8
2013 26,775 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 3,713 365 70.2
2014 26,489 5th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 3,583 365 74.8
2015 18,351 1st lowest of 15 · 61% of median 1,506 315 58.6
2016 22,331 3rd lowest of 15 · 75% of median 3,759 326 61.3
2017 29,907 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 3,828 365 59.1
2018 34,444 13th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 6,252 365 87.5
2019 19,135 2nd lowest of 15 · 64% of median 4,871 345 54.9
2020 27,585 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 3,285 320 74.8
2021 30,125 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 2,934 353 71.9
2022 33,191 12th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 1,916 352 78.4
2023 35,772 14th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 1,747 365 72.5
2024 39,861 15th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 2,301 366 81.4
2025 30,177 10th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 2,258 304 90.6

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.