← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SPRING GULCH DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3001226 · 1 · SPRING GULCH · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1908-05-01 — 399th most senior of the 2277 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JAMES DITCH (1908-04-04). Immediately behind: JAKINO DITCH (1908-05-14).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21305.0 | 1908-05-01 | 1923-11-08 | 2.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRSTK | A-47 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 358 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1987, came in at 28 AF — 8% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1973 | 1,312 | 15th lowest of 15 · 366% of median | 365 | 2.5 |
| 1974 | 526 | 12th lowest of 15 · 147% of median | 334 | 1.0 |
| 1975 | 837 | 14th lowest of 15 · 234% of median | 365 | 1.5 |
| 1976 | 803 | 13th lowest of 15 · 224% of median | 365 | 1.2 |
| 1977 | 364 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 304 | 1.2 |
| 1978 | 403 | 10th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | 169 | 1.5 |
| 1979 | 358 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 147 | 1.2 |
| 1980 | 95 | 5th lowest of 15 · 26% of median | 149 | 1.0 |
| 1981 | 435 | 11th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 233 | 1.2 |
| 1982 | 240 | 7th lowest of 15 · 67% of median | 304 | 0.4 |
| 1983 | 137 | 6th lowest of 15 · 38% of median | 143 | 0.5 |
| 1984 | 32 | 4th lowest of 15 · 9% of median | 176 | 0.1 |
| 1985 | 19 | 1st lowest of 15 · 5% of median | 174 | 0.1 |
| 1986 | 24 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 7% of median | 242 | 0.1 |
| 1987 | 28 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 8% of median | 304 | 0.1 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.