← My Water · Print / save as PDF
GRAHAM CREEK NO 1 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3100533 · 1 · EAST CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:18 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1884-12-31 — 306th most senior of the 1037 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JOE S & CHAR B MACK IRG AP (1884-01-03). Immediately behind: GRAHAM CREEK NO 2 DITCH (1884-12-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12784.0 | 1884-12-31 | 1934-06-12 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | E-1 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 217 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2017, came in at 164 AF — 76% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 42 | 1st lowest of 15 · 19% of median | 47 | 1.0 |
| 2004 | 139 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 99 | 2.2 |
| 2005 | 182 | 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 126 | 1.5 |
| 2006 | 217 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 126 | 1.5 |
| 2007 | 315 | 13th lowest of 15 · 145% of median | 153 | 1.9 |
| 2008 | 383 | 15th lowest of 15 · 176% of median | 165 | 1.7 |
| 2009 | 183 | 6th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 112 | 1.2 |
| 2010 | 288 | 12th lowest of 15 · 133% of median | 153 | 1.9 |
| 2011 | 357 | 14th lowest of 15 · 164% of median | 142 | 2.1 |
| 2012 | 219 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 142 | 1.5 |
| 2013 | 187 | 7th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 129 | 1.1 |
| 2014 | 242 | 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 117 | 1.7 |
| 2015 | 234 | 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 170 | 1.2 |
| 2016 | 149 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 141 | 1.1 |
| 2017 | 164 | 4th lowest of 15 · 76% of median | 123 | 1.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.