← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BEAVER VALLEY DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3100571 · 1 · BEAVER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:22 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1900-06-12349th most senior of the 1037 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CLARA WOLF DITCH (1895-12-31). Immediately behind: IGNACIO DRAW DITCH (1903-11-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30843.184251900-06-121966-03-07 2.00.0 CIRRDOM 65-2

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 147 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1982, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1968 131 6th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 35 2.0
1969 182 11th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 56 3.0
1970 196 12th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 62 5.0
1971 169 10th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 101 2.0
1972 110 4th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 36 2.0
1973 153 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 44 2.0
1974 147 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 76 2.0
1975 121 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 71 1.0
1976 147 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 72 1.5
1977 200 13th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 62 3.0
1978 55 3rd lowest of 15 · 37% of median 61 1.0
1979 214 15th lowest of 15 · 146% of median 70 2.0
1980 208 14th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 57 2.0
1981 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
1982 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.