Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ROBT MORRISON D HEAIR EX

Structure dossier · WDID 3100645 · 1 · LOS PINOS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:35 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1968-11-10 — 471st most senior of the 1037 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CURRIE-JACK CREEK PL (1965-07-06). Immediately behind: DRIPPING SPRINGS (1970-07-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44559.434131968-11-101972-12-31 2.50.0 CIRRSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 59 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2015, came in at 4 AF — 7% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2001 256 14th lowest of 15 · 434% of median 111 1.8
2002 14 5th lowest of 15 · 24% of median 23 0.4
2003 49 7th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 64 0.5
2004 254 13th lowest of 15 · 430% of median 134 1.4
2005 229 12th lowest of 15 · 388% of median 123 1.8
2006 267 15th lowest of 15 · 452% of median 127 1.8
2007 131 11th lowest of 15 · 222% of median 127 1.2
2008 71 9th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 90 0.8
2009 79 10th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 83 1.0
2010 59 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 92 0.6
2011 43 6th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 73 0.6
2012 9 4th lowest of 15 · 15% of median 30 0.4
2013 7 2nd lowest of 15 · 12% of median 32 0.2
2014 8 3rd lowest of 15 · 14% of median 34 0.3
2015 4 1st lowest of 15 · 7% of median 38 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3558 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 25% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2015 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.